Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
I,m targetting my next watch sometime in Janûary and deciding between these 2. Either a Grand Seiko sBGA011 or a white 40mm Rolex Explorer II. Would love to get both.but my bonus isn,t that much what do you guys think will be the consideratio.n to choose either watch?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
- chriscentro
- Senior member
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: 26 Nov 2012 11:40
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
I wish I have this decision to make.
If it were me, I would choose the snow flake as I think it's more difficult to source for one and it has a wonderfully accurate movement with magical gliding second hand.
If it were me, I would choose the snow flake as I think it's more difficult to source for one and it has a wonderfully accurate movement with magical gliding second hand.
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
My friend you ask this in a Seiko Forum...what do you think the verdict will be..
But for what its worth, I think its not comparing apples to apples.
Both are great watches but having an Explorer II and a GS (mech) I can only say the workmanship on the Rolex is not as refined as the GS. But if you want resale and recognition, it has to be the Rolex.
I had the Rolex for quite awhile now so I can atest to its ruggedness and durability and reliabilty. As for the GS, so far so good. I do not know about the spring drives though.
The Rolex has another avantage of a GMT hand.
The Rolex in its current guise is I think a bit more expensive. Who know what it will cost come Jan 2015 while the yen is in a good position for GS purchases.
So really its up to you as it is your bonus not everyone else's.
However in true Seiko Club tradition I would say ......
...................
Go for the Grand SEIKO...what else...hahahaha
But for what its worth, I think its not comparing apples to apples.
Both are great watches but having an Explorer II and a GS (mech) I can only say the workmanship on the Rolex is not as refined as the GS. But if you want resale and recognition, it has to be the Rolex.
I had the Rolex for quite awhile now so I can atest to its ruggedness and durability and reliabilty. As for the GS, so far so good. I do not know about the spring drives though.
The Rolex has another avantage of a GMT hand.
The Rolex in its current guise is I think a bit more expensive. Who know what it will cost come Jan 2015 while the yen is in a good position for GS purchases.
So really its up to you as it is your bonus not everyone else's.
However in true Seiko Club tradition I would say ......
...................
Go for the Grand SEIKO...what else...hahahaha
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Buy a Seiko.
"Please touch your own favorite watch with your kind heart and love forever." - Ikuo Tokunaga, Chief Designer of SEIKO Dive Watches and Sports Watches
- Cosmograph
- Member
- Posts: 985
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012 09:47
- Location: Little Red Dot
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Snowflake if you are after a Spring Drive and dress piece & most importantly a keeper. Rolex if you intend to flip at some point. Both are decent watches in their own right.
Enjoying Japanese, Swiss, Germans & Micros quartz or mechanical, solar/Eco or kinetic, electronic
Time is one's best friend or worst enemy. You can't stop her or contain her but you can use her or watch her go by!
Time is one's best friend or worst enemy. You can't stop her or contain her but you can use her or watch her go by!
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
I,m leaning towards snowflake personally too. But the explorer ii is undeniably easier to flip if i ever need to. Lol.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
that,s why i,m comparing the 40mm explorer ii. I,m actually more likely to get a 42mm explorer ii but i don,t want price as part of the comparisonKKFA wrote:My friend you ask this in a Seiko Forum...what do you think the verdict will be..
But for what its worth, I think its not comparing apples to apples.
Both are great watches but having an Explorer II and a GS (mech) I can only say the workmanship on the Rolex is not as refined as the GS. But if you want resale and recognition, it has to be the Rolex.
I had the Rolex for quite awhile now so I can atest to its ruggedness and durability and reliabilty. As for the GS, so far so good. I do not know about the spring drives though.
The Rolex has another avantage of a GMT hand.
The Rolex in its current guise is I think a bit more expensive. Who know what it will cost come Jan 2015 while the yen is in a good position for GS purchases.
So really its up to you as it is your bonus not everyone else's.
However in true Seiko Club tradition I would say ......
...................
Go for the Grand SEIKO...what else...hahahaha
I heard about yen is low now too but i don,t keep track so i,m really unsure the relativity.and whether it,ll drop lower.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
-
- Member
- Posts: 695
- Joined: 13 Sep 2014 12:21
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Since your bonus isn't much get the rolex in case u need cash one day. Snowflake when u have more disposable income... Sorry my 2 cents since that's what I would do if I were in your shoes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You are not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.
- Tyler Durden
- Tyler Durden
- Cosmograph
- Member
- Posts: 985
- Joined: 30 Jan 2012 09:47
- Location: Little Red Dot
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Frankly if it were down to the Rolex Exp II, Personally would rather go with the 40mm older model. Yes, the bracelet may not be as good etc. but that to me is classic. The 42mm may fit those who love bigger pieces but for me, its just not as sweet, sure an "upgraded" movement and better bracelet but if 42mm, Better to get a Steiny and save the rest of the cash for something else IMO.
Enjoying Japanese, Swiss, Germans & Micros quartz or mechanical, solar/Eco or kinetic, electronic
Time is one's best friend or worst enemy. You can't stop her or contain her but you can use her or watch her go by!
Time is one's best friend or worst enemy. You can't stop her or contain her but you can use her or watch her go by!
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
ya i guess that's the general feeling about liquidity of the rolex brand. I don't doubt it eitheroncleoliver wrote:Since your bonus isn't much get the rolex in case u need cash one day. Snowflake when u have more disposable income... Sorry my 2 cents since that's what I would do if I were in your shoes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Cosmograph wrote:Frankly if it were down to the Rolex Exp II, Personally would rather go with the 40mm older model. Yes, the bracelet may not be as good etc. but that to me is classic. The 42mm may fit those who love bigger pieces but for me, its just not as sweet, sure an "upgraded" movement and better bracelet but if 42mm, Better to get a Steiny and save the rest of the cash for something else IMO.
Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
i alr have all the current model steinhart ocean 42mm range except vintage red.LOL!! If aramar had not cancelled their white ocean ,i probably will not be looking for a explorer ii today. I like the 42mm simply because of the size, i like both 40mm & 42mm for the white dialCosmograph wrote:Frankly if it were down to the Rolex Exp II, Personally would rather go with the 40mm older model. Yes, the bracelet may not be as good etc. but that to me is classic. The 42mm may fit those who love bigger pieces but for me, its just not as sweet, sure an "upgraded" movement and better bracelet but if 42mm, Better to get a Steiny and save the rest of the cash for something else IMO.
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
If it's a watch you plan on looking after for the next generation, then get the..... Snowflake!
I agree w the rest here. If u plan on flipping for cash or trade, then the Rolex Exp II is the best choice.
Sent from The Force
I agree w the rest here. If u plan on flipping for cash or trade, then the Rolex Exp II is the best choice.
Sent from The Force
-
- Member
- Posts: 695
- Joined: 13 Sep 2014 12:21
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Next generation.... Like the Patek Phillipe ad lolz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You are not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.
- Tyler Durden
- Tyler Durden
Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
ya seems that is the general consensus amongst other things.but again, nobody knows will spring drive ever discontinue and if so, how to get parts replacement.big-e-294 wrote:If it's a watch you plan on looking after for the next generation, then get the..... Snowflake!
I agree w the rest here. If u plan on flipping for cash or trade, then the Rolex Exp II is the best choice.
Sent from The Force
Last edited by Jeryltan on 29 Sep 2014 15:12, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
Sir, if you value high quality dial and hands, and not so common Seiko, take the GS. But if you consider hassle free and long term spare parts availability, Rolex could be a better choice. But Rolex is too common nowadays....
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
don't call me sir le. I still young.... At heart LOL!Beginner1 wrote:Sir, if you value high quality dial and hands, and not so common Seiko, take the GS. But if you consider hassle free and long term spare parts availability, Rolex could be a better choice. But Rolex is too common nowadays....
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
SD spares is a concern, especially for the Quartz oscillator IC and the RegulatorJeryltan wrote:ya seems that is the general consensus amongst other things.but again, nobody knows will spring drive ever discontinue and if so, how to get parts replacement.big-e-294 wrote:If it's a watch you plan on looking after for the next generation, then get the..... Snowflake!
I agree w the rest here. If u plan on flipping for cash or trade, then the Rolex Exp II is the best choice.
Sent from The Force
Apart from that the rest is a mech watch.
But since Seiko grows their own quartz crystal, maybe it's not an issue.
SD has been around for a decade, so I doubt it be discontinued. Like the Quartz technology, Seiko is proud of the SD technology. I believe they will develop to further.
I'm not a big SD fan yet, I still prefer the tick tock of a mechanical.
But I salute Seiko on the SD engineering, it is simply amazing.
Sent from The Force
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
snowflake 1st, exp II later
GS is for you to admire, while roc is for other to admire
:p
GS is for you to admire, while roc is for other to admire
:p
Re: Grand Seiko SBGA011 vs Rolex Explorer II
*sigh* i thougjt i was going to get the GS. But with all these maybe i will just settle for the EXPii and assure i can easier to flip ieven i decide to get tje agS insteadbig-e-294 wrote:SD spares is a concern, especially for the Quartz oscillator IC and the RegulatorJeryltan wrote:ya seems that is the general consensus amongst other things.but again, nobody knows will spring drive ever discontinue and if so, how to get parts replacement.
Apart from that the rest is a mech watch.
But since Seiko grows their own quartz crystal, maybe it's not an issue.
SD has been around for a decade, so I doubt it be discontinued. Like the Quartz technology, Seiko is proud of the SD technology. I believe they will develop to further.
I'm not a big SD fan yet, I still prefer the tick tock of a mechanical.
But I salute Seiko on the SD engineering, it is simply amazing.
Sent from The Force