Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
Hi SC bros, I nd help on tis Omega speed pro as I google thru Omega website n eyein on tis 2 pcs...
http://www.omegawatches.com/gents/speed ... l/35735000" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Speed pro
1) Reference: 3570.50.00 usin cal. 1861 wit Hesalite xtal
2) Reference: 3573.50.00 usin cal. 1863 wit Sapphire xtal
both are Lemania 1873 base movement but oni diff ish cal. 1863 hab 18Jewels...
Cal. 1861
http://www.omegarolex.com/details/01861.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Cal.1863
http://www.omegarolex.com/details/01863.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
can anyhuan input more info wit ur knowledge or expertise on tis 2 1861 & 1863 movement n Hesalite & Sapphire xtal...thk in advance...
http://www.omegawatches.com/gents/speed ... l/35735000" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Speed pro
1) Reference: 3570.50.00 usin cal. 1861 wit Hesalite xtal
2) Reference: 3573.50.00 usin cal. 1863 wit Sapphire xtal
both are Lemania 1873 base movement but oni diff ish cal. 1863 hab 18Jewels...
Cal. 1861
http://www.omegarolex.com/details/01861.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Cal.1863
http://www.omegarolex.com/details/01863.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
can anyhuan input more info wit ur knowledge or expertise on tis 2 1861 & 1863 movement n Hesalite & Sapphire xtal...thk in advance...
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
1863 movt should be more elaborated..decorated since its seen with display caseback but 1861 normally with normal caseback.
After googling...here's what I got;
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t= ... #msg_num_2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The 1863 has an added extra jewel and a metal brake is used for the chronograph mechanism vs. the nylon one on the 1861 and it has a nicer finish to the movement. All three of those features make the 1863 movement more pleasing to look at, but there is a downside to using a metal brake in that it does wear down over time and require oiling whereas the nylon break in the 1861 movement does not. All that really means to you as the owner is that eventually you will have to pay to replace the metal brake after many years of use and servicing.
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/speedy ... 71616.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Basically, the 1863 is the decorated version of the 1861. It is Rhodium plated (or gold in the case of the 863), and is designed to go with a display back. When Omega made a display backed Speedy with a hesalite crystal (the 3572.50), is also used the 1863.
http://jholbrook.proboards.com/index.cg ... hread=4142" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To clarify, both the 1861 and the 1863 have the extra jewel. The 863 has the 18th but the bridge still says "Seventeen".
Apparently Omega put "Eighteen" on all the rhodium bridges and included the 18th on the 1861 as well as the 1863.
http://www.chronocentric.com/forums/ome ... read;id=50" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Speedmaster Pro 1861 vs. 1863, what a brochure just in from Omega tells me both movements have 18 jewels, 45 hour power reserve, 21.6 frequency, and are based on the Lemania 1873 calibre. It further says both have white rhodium plated traditional chronograph movements with special waves. It describes the 1863 movement as 'deluxe version with additional waves.
After googling...here's what I got;
http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t= ... #msg_num_2" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The 1863 has an added extra jewel and a metal brake is used for the chronograph mechanism vs. the nylon one on the 1861 and it has a nicer finish to the movement. All three of those features make the 1863 movement more pleasing to look at, but there is a downside to using a metal brake in that it does wear down over time and require oiling whereas the nylon break in the 1861 movement does not. All that really means to you as the owner is that eventually you will have to pay to replace the metal brake after many years of use and servicing.
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/speedy ... 71616.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Basically, the 1863 is the decorated version of the 1861. It is Rhodium plated (or gold in the case of the 863), and is designed to go with a display back. When Omega made a display backed Speedy with a hesalite crystal (the 3572.50), is also used the 1863.
http://jholbrook.proboards.com/index.cg ... hread=4142" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
To clarify, both the 1861 and the 1863 have the extra jewel. The 863 has the 18th but the bridge still says "Seventeen".
Apparently Omega put "Eighteen" on all the rhodium bridges and included the 18th on the 1861 as well as the 1863.
http://www.chronocentric.com/forums/ome ... read;id=50" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Speedmaster Pro 1861 vs. 1863, what a brochure just in from Omega tells me both movements have 18 jewels, 45 hour power reserve, 21.6 frequency, and are based on the Lemania 1873 calibre. It further says both have white rhodium plated traditional chronograph movements with special waves. It describes the 1863 movement as 'deluxe version with additional waves.
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
thk oOsiMm bro 4 de input...it seem that gt pro & cons 4 both 1861 & 1863 movt...
Pro 4 1863...
1863 hab de extra jewel.
1863 has an added extra jewel n de metal brake ish used 4 de chronograph mechanism
1863 movement more pleasing 2 look @^@
1863 movement as 'deluxe version wit additional waves.
1863 movt shd b more elaborated..decorated since its seen wit display caseback
Cons 4 1863...
dnside 2 usin a metal brake in that it does wear down over time n require oiling n oso nd 2 pay 2 replace de metal brake aft many yrs of use n servicing.
1861...
1861 hab de extra jewel.
the nylon break in de 1861 movement does nt wear dn
1861 normally wit normal caseback
btw i oso notis that 1861 ish usin Hesalite & 1863 ish usin Sapphire...it seem rike Hesalite ish much more better than Sapphire aft read tis link...
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f45/omega- ... l-108.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Pro 4 1863...
1863 hab de extra jewel.
1863 has an added extra jewel n de metal brake ish used 4 de chronograph mechanism
1863 movement more pleasing 2 look @^@
1863 movement as 'deluxe version wit additional waves.
1863 movt shd b more elaborated..decorated since its seen wit display caseback
Cons 4 1863...
dnside 2 usin a metal brake in that it does wear down over time n require oiling n oso nd 2 pay 2 replace de metal brake aft many yrs of use n servicing.
1861...
1861 hab de extra jewel.
the nylon break in de 1861 movement does nt wear dn
1861 normally wit normal caseback
btw i oso notis that 1861 ish usin Hesalite & 1863 ish usin Sapphire...it seem rike Hesalite ish much more better than Sapphire aft read tis link...
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f45/omega- ... l-108.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
aiken kor kor going to hoot Omega????
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
might hab a chance 2 hoot huan either 1861 or 1863...iV3RsOn wrote:aiken kor kor going to hoot Omega????
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
aiken is also elite.aiken74 wrote:might hab a chance 2 hoot huan either 1861 or 1863...iV3RsOn wrote:aiken kor kor going to hoot Omega????
now i moody..have no spare $$ to hoot omega.
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
bo elite la...btw jz call THG 2 chk on tis...MeePokMan wrote:aiken is also elite.aiken74 wrote:
might hab a chance 2 hoot huan either 1861 or 1863...
now i moody..have no spare $$ to hoot omega.
speed pro
ref:3570.50.00 usin cal.1861 retail price ish 5,900 b4 discount
ref:3573.50.00 usin cal.1863 no stock
ref:311.30.42.30.01.003 aka "Apollo 15" 40th Anniversary Limited Edition usin cal.1861 retail price ish 7,750 b4 discount
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
1861 how many % dicount???aiken74 wrote:bo elite la...btw jz call THG 2 chk on tis...MeePokMan wrote:
aiken is also elite.
now i moody..have no spare $$ to hoot omega.
speed pro
ref:3570.50.00 usin cal.1861 retail price ish 5,900 b4 discount
ref:3573.50.00 usin cal.1863 no stock
ref:311.30.42.30.01.003 aka "Apollo 15" 40th Anniversary Limited Edition usin cal.1861 retail price ish 7,750 b4 discount
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
de saleman tel me go dn thn give discount bt hor moi CO noe sumone in THG n can gt more discount... i alr sms her n nw wait 4 leply...iV3RsOn wrote:1861 how many % dicount???aiken74 wrote:
bo elite la...btw jz call THG 2 chk on tis...
speed pro
ref:3570.50.00 usin cal.1861 retail price ish 5,900 b4 discount
ref:3573.50.00 usin cal.1863 no stock
ref:311.30.42.30.01.003 aka "Apollo 15" 40th Anniversary Limited Edition usin cal.1861 retail price ish 7,750 b4 discount
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
wah u also SELL POTATO 1 hor???me eat til 30+yr old haven go thg b4 leh...
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
NB...mai tok cock lah...thn where ur gt ur all ur lolex sub...frm BKK izzitAstro2212 wrote: wah u also SELL POTATO 1 hor???me eat til 30+yr old haven go thg b4 leh...
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
Knn all pre-owned leh...aiken74 wrote:NB...mai tok cock lah...thn where ur gt ur all ur lolex sub...frm BKK izzitAstro2212 wrote: wah u also SELL POTATO 1 hor???me eat til 30+yr old haven go thg b4 leh...
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
okok mai OT liao...
which huan better 1861 or 1863
in term of movement & 1861 wit Hesalite xtal or 1863 wit Sapphire xtal
which huan better 1861 or 1863
in term of movement & 1861 wit Hesalite xtal or 1863 wit Sapphire xtal
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
hesalite crystal will have a signed omega logo on it, sapphire dun haveaiken74 wrote:okok mai OT liao...
which huan better 1861 or 1863
in term of movement & 1861 wit Hesalite xtal or 1863 wit Sapphire xtal
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
bro which mean 3570.50.00 usin 1861 hab de signed omega logo on hesalite xtal n oso read up tis link...sayin thatlunarin79 wrote:hesalite crystal will have a signed omega logo on it, sapphire dun haveaiken74 wrote:okok mai OT liao...
which huan better 1861 or 1863
in term of movement & 1861 wit Hesalite xtal or 1863 wit Sapphire xtal
http://www.omega-addict.com/movement.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The current production of cal.861's uses a plastic part, which is not showed in the cal.861 movement below. The Speedmaster Professional which have the see-through case-back, use a Cal. 863. This is a cal.861 which was a bit restyled for better looks. The plastic part has disapeard in the cal. 863. Ofcourse
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
update as moi ctc in THG mention that tmr 15/9 there will b a increase of price of branded watches up to 6%....
Speed pro Ref: 3570.50.00 was given 18% off...so $4,850...
Speed pro Ref: 3570.50.00 was given 18% off...so $4,850...
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
wats so gd abt hesalite crystal???aiken74 wrote:update as moi ctc in THG mention that tmr 15/9 there will b a increase of price of branded watches up to 6%....
Speed pro Ref: 3570.50.00 was given 18% off...so $4,850...
nb, they increase price like no tml lor.... 18% ish alot!!!!
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
here de link...iV3RsOn wrote:wats so gd abt hesalite crystal???aiken74 wrote:update as moi ctc in THG mention that tmr 15/9 there will b a increase of price of branded watches up to 6%....
Speed pro Ref: 3570.50.00 was given 18% off...so $4,850...
nb, they increase price like no tml lor.... 18% ish alot!!!!
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f45/omega- ... l-108.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
hmm she told me that other pl will oni give up to 8% discount...
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
IMO.... 1861 is better in the long run .... but hor service and parts are all readily available from Omega... bo si mi difference........ to 1863.... so it boil down to which one you prefer most cosmetically!!
Re: Omega cal. 1861 vs 1863
thk bro...i stil prefer 1861 n will make a reserve soon...watchlooker wrote:IMO.... 1861 is better in the long run .... but hor service and parts are all readily available from Omega... bo si mi difference........ to 1863.... so it boil down to which one you prefer most cosmetically!!