Page 2 of 2

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 11:11
by big-e-294
watchlooker wrote:Nice watches u all have..... not wearing any at home today.....
Sho u r wearing same watch as what roo didi wore yesterday! :)

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 14:45
by ivangonzalez
lunarin79 wrote:back to this :oops:

Image
nice looking speedy !

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 15:01
by oOsiMm
got date one. I think those are valjoux movements and they are cheaper than the non date ones. The speedy reduced also bo date and they are autos.

I am not so sure abt modern speedies/reduced but generally manual winding speedies are without date and using 321/861/1861. For autos,the vintage one would be lemania 5100 based speedy 4.5 with the extra chrono -"minute totaliser" hand.

Modern Chronographs using valjoux with dates are generally cheaper in movt price but the actual watch price depends on the brand riao lor.. cos some brand with the special casing (using valjoux) will cost much more than these vintage manual wind omega speedmaster pro.

Speedmaster without dates are much much much better looking as if there's date,the whole dial would seem too cluttered.. too many things to notice...

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 16:23
by sellwatch
oOsiMm wrote:
got date one. I think those are valjoux movements and they are cheaper than the non date ones. The speedy reduced also bo date and they are autos.

I am not so sure abt modern speedies/reduced but generally manual winding speedies are without date and using 321/861/1861. For autos,the vintage one would be lemania 5100 based speedy 4.5 with the extra chrono -"minute totaliser" hand.

Modern Chronographs using valjoux with dates are generally cheaper in movt price but the actual watch price depends on the brand riao lor.. cos some brand with the special casing (using valjoux) will cost much more than these vintage manual wind omega speedmaster pro.

Speedmaster without dates are much much much better looking as if there's date,the whole dial would seem too cluttered.. too many things to notice...
yeah the valjoux are cheaper. I remember i saw one with date but that didnt entice me. I cannot remember the model but here is one speedy with date. I am pretty sure this is not the one i saw.

Image

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 16:30
by lunarin79
sellwatch wrote:
Image

i ish still prefer 3-6-9 sub dial for speedy ;)

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 22:13
by Malo
Abit late but I worn this today...

Image

Picture was taken last Sunday :roll:

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 22:38
by okies8
watchlooker wrote:Nice watches u all have..... not wearing any at home today.....
so u usually hv watch on wrist most of the time at home huh...in bed?

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 13 Apr 2011 23:20
by zhwong
On me 24/7 lol

Image

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 14 Apr 2011 00:27
by lunarin79
i tink there's issues with photobucket & imageshack

cannot see any pics leh..or isit just me? ;)

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 14 Apr 2011 01:34
by chromehead
can't see sai captain! :lol:

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 14 Apr 2011 02:03
by oOsiMm
lunarin79 wrote:i tink there's issues with photobucket & imageshack

cannot see any pics leh..or isit just me? ;)
Its everyone. Its affecting my sales riao...ppl PM they see nothing so got to sent them pics...

think photobucket uplorry riao..

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 14 Apr 2011 07:58
by roo7
From the error I see, I think you must specific to imageshack which website you are embedding the pics.

I'm using http://www.flickr.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; no issue so far.

Re: My First WRUWT post

Posted: 14 Apr 2011 08:24
by lunarin79
oOsiMm wrote:
think photobucket uplorry riao..
nOooooOooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :cry: :cry:

My First WRUWT post

Posted: 14 Apr 2011 09:40
by funky_banana
wah the infamous frog in ice ish back!