-
lunarin79
- CEO
- Posts: 12958
- Joined: 11 Apr 2011 00:20
Post
by lunarin79 » 30 Sep 2014 18:27
Cosmograph wrote:CEO, may I suggest that no LE numbers be put on the watch simply cuz everyone will (ok not all but a good majority) want to book this and that and instead, go with just 1 of 50 on the back. 01/50 for all. or a simple 50/50 or LE 50. This will help the whole process too. That's what I see IWC doing and to me works better than having individual numbers as people buy the forum watch anyway. Just my take.
Tbh, i am ok with your suggestion bro.
LE50 seems feasible.
Let's hear from the others first.
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
-
lunarin79
- CEO
- Posts: 12958
- Joined: 11 Apr 2011 00:20
Post
by lunarin79 » 30 Sep 2014 18:29
Threeemperor wrote:Can the wording limited edition be replaced by SCS edition?
Le Jin common...
Can we have lume bezel marker?
For your consideration..
Thanks
U mean the caseback text?
The caseback is not finalised yet
Ok, will check on lume bezel markers
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
-
balzebub71
- Senior member
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: 06 Jul 2013 22:11
- Location: Singapore
Post
by balzebub71 » 30 Sep 2014 19:31
Threeemperor wrote:Can the wording limited edition be replaced by SCS edition?
Le Jin common...
Can we have lume bezel marker?
For your consideration..
Thanks
Support...SCS EDITION more fierce. And lumed bezel is best.
I want to be a one watch guy!!
-
roo7
- IT Superman
- Posts: 6867
- Joined: 10 Apr 2011 22:05
- Location: Singapore
-
Contact:
Post
by roo7 » 30 Sep 2014 20:19
I think unnumbered LE is a good idea too. Fact is this watch won't be reproduced for sale anyway without referencing back to SCS.
The SCS Edition 50. Sounds good. It will be the best if we can hit 65
50 just inline with SG50 for 2015 thou.
-
zeikphur
Post
by zeikphur » 30 Sep 2014 20:31
roo7 wrote:I think unnumbered LE is a good idea too. Fact is this watch won't be reproduced for sale anyway without referencing back to SCS.
The SCS Edition 50. Sounds good. It will be the best if we can hit 65
50 just inline with SG50 for 2015 thou.
建国配套
陪你到老
-
Evirobie
Post
by Evirobie » 30 Sep 2014 20:50
50. Still no number 69. Or 81...
~~~Delivered personally by the minions~~~
-
telepgm
- Senior member
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: 16 Feb 2012 09:42
Post
by telepgm » 30 Sep 2014 21:13
Cosmograph wrote:CEO, may I suggest that no LE numbers be put on the watch simply cuz everyone will (ok not all but a good majority) want to book this and that and instead, go with just 1 of 50 on the back. 01/50 for all. or a simple 50/50 or LE 50. This will help the whole process too. That's what I see IWC doing and to me works better than having individual numbers as people buy the forum watch anyway. Just my take.
i second that.
it'll look cleaner.
-
telepgm
- Senior member
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: 16 Feb 2012 09:42
Post
by telepgm » 30 Sep 2014 21:14
zeikphur wrote:roo7 wrote:I think unnumbered LE is a good idea too. Fact is this watch won't be reproduced for sale anyway without referencing back to SCS.
The SCS Edition 50. Sounds good. It will be the best if we can hit 65
50 just inline with SG50 for 2015 thou.
建国配套
陪你到老
阿彪did a pretty good job in drag huh? Lol.
-
oncleoliver
- Member
- Posts: 695
- Joined: 13 Sep 2014 12:21
Post
by oncleoliver » 30 Sep 2014 22:01
Clean is good.
Less is more
You are not your job. You're not how much money you have in the bank. You're not the car you drive. You're not the contents of your wallet. You're not your fucking khakis. You're the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the world.
- Tyler Durden
-
lunarin79
- CEO
- Posts: 12958
- Joined: 11 Apr 2011 00:20
Post
by lunarin79 » 30 Sep 2014 22:06
if all bros agree to un-numbered serial, we can proceed.
still waiting for other members' comments on this
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
-
zeikphur
Post
by zeikphur » 30 Sep 2014 22:09
I am cool with it being unnumbered
-
Trident
- Senior member
- Posts: 2012
- Joined: 29 Sep 2013 11:20
- Location: Toa Payoh
Post
by Trident » 30 Sep 2014 22:17
Please don't take my 6 "Luck" away.
For me, LE shd come with serial number as it will give them identity.
Without the number, it's just another watch.
-
Wade
- Member
- Posts: 388
- Joined: 20 Apr 2013 21:06
Post
by Wade » 30 Sep 2014 22:31
Any target price for this 2015 project watch?
A man age doesn't matter; it's the man heart... think positive & good things will come along the way...
-
lunarin79
- CEO
- Posts: 12958
- Joined: 11 Apr 2011 00:20
Post
by lunarin79 » 30 Sep 2014 22:45
Wade wrote:Any target price for this 2015 project watch?
pricing is not confirmed yet but my guess is under $450.
I will update the price when Obris Morgan gets back to me based on our requirements
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
-
Wade
- Member
- Posts: 388
- Joined: 20 Apr 2013 21:06
Post
by Wade » 30 Sep 2014 23:07
lunarin79 wrote:Wade wrote:Any target price for this 2015 project watch?
pricing is not confirmed yet but my guess is under $450.
I will update the price when Obris Morgan gets back to me based on our requirements
Pretty cool
A man age doesn't matter; it's the man heart... think positive & good things will come along the way...
-
rojakman
- Senior member
- Posts: 1702
- Joined: 05 Mar 2014 23:42
Post
by rojakman » 30 Sep 2014 23:11
I would prefer serial number.
Using Tapatalk
-
seiko siao
- Senior member
- Posts: 2212
- Joined: 29 Apr 2011 18:15
Post
by seiko siao » 30 Sep 2014 23:29
i would wan serial number for my LE especially if the LE is in 2 digits only.
Wist List
IWC IW377709 or IW377719
Panerai PAM 111
Seiko MM300 SDBX001 or SBDX012
Tudor Blackbay Bronze 79250BM
Omega Speedmaster 311.30.42.30.01.005
Longines Legend Diver L3.674.4.50.0
-
Lgt
- Member
- Posts: 298
- Joined: 31 Aug 2011 11:09
Post
by Lgt » 30 Sep 2014 23:31
Yup, would like the LE number too....unless cost is an issue
-
Badern
- Member
- Posts: 322
- Joined: 10 Apr 2011 23:13
Post
by Badern » 01 Oct 2014 01:20
No need LE number for me. Easier for organizers to send out .
-
okies
Post
by okies » 01 Oct 2014 10:07
I am fine with both..