Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
This 6309 hands and dial looks original or AM?
Is the bevel at the date window, beveled enough?
The inscription below read "6309-704X T (suwa symbol) MOV'T JAPAN CASED HONG KONG"
Sorry my camera( or my skill) cant get a good picture on that.
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
Dial read as 6309-704x bt hw come date wheel ish kanji huan??? Mayb de movt ish 6306 huan...
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
i also feel strange about this part.aiken74 wrote:Dial read as 6309-704x bt hw come date wheel ish kanji huan??? Mayb de movt ish 6306 huan...
But it dont hack so should be 6309 with 6306 day wheel??
other then that, dial and hand looks legit?
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
dial seems ok, but if you have more photos showing the 12 and 6 hour markers, as that's where you can tell the most difference. But just judging from the patina, they seems to match.
And we noticed from earlier posts, hong kong dials don't have a bevelled date window, so we cannot use that to verify. Kanji date wheel is a pretty common mod, my 6309 comes with a kanji date wheel too, guess it's modded.
And we noticed from earlier posts, hong kong dials don't have a bevelled date window, so we cannot use that to verify. Kanji date wheel is a pretty common mod, my 6309 comes with a kanji date wheel too, guess it's modded.
Not as active.
blog: https://jiehong.org/
blog: https://jiehong.org/
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
thanks. will post more picture later.roo7 wrote:dial seems ok, but if you have more photos showing the 12 and 6 hour markers, as that's where you can tell the most difference. But just judging from the patina, they seems to match.
And we noticed from earlier posts, hong kong dials don't have a bevelled date window, so we cannot use that to verify. Kanji date wheel is a pretty common mod, my 6309 comes with a kanji date wheel too, guess it's modded.
Never know hong kong dial is less/ no bevelled.
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
the bevelled part is not as 'angled' as a normal 6309
urs looked ok
as for the hands, it looks original but not sure if its original to a 6309
the endtip of the secondhand is not 'pointed' so it's an original secondhand
urs looked ok
as for the hands, it looks original but not sure if its original to a 6309
the endtip of the secondhand is not 'pointed' so it's an original secondhand
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
Last edited by stepper78 on 28 Apr 2012 10:28, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
Thanks CEO.lunarin79 wrote:the bevelled part is not as 'angled' as a normal 6309
urs looked ok
as for the hands, it looks original but not sure if its original to a 6309
the endtip of the secondhand is not 'pointed' so it's an original secondhand
So much things to "see" for a 6309.
I have post more pictures. Experts, please let me know your view. Thans.
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
bezel insert i suspect is AM
the pip looked too small
the pip looked too small
Seiko Club Gathering 2016
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
Yah, and too new and shiny to match with such a dial....
Not as active.
blog: https://jiehong.org/
blog: https://jiehong.org/
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
here de comparsion between original (upper pc) & oem (below pc)...
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
Bezel insert confirm A/Mlunarin79 wrote:bezel insert i suspect is AM
the pip looked too small
Re: Expert Needed: 6309 Dial Original or A/M
The 12 and 6 markers looks ok?roo7 wrote:Yah, and too new and shiny to match with such a dial....